Hi, itβsΒ Alex from 20VC. Iβm investing in seed & series A European vertical solutions (vSol) which are industry specific solutions aiming to become industry OS and combining dynamics from SaaS, marketplaces and fintechs. Overlooked is a weekly newsletter about venture capital and vSol. Today, Iβm sharing the most insightful tech news of October.
Tuesday, Oct. 1st: Index dedicated an entire chapter to early hires in its guide on scaling startups. - Index
βFounders should prioritize βpeople-relatedβ issues, spending up to 50% of their time on hiring, onboarding, and team organization.β
βStart with founder-led recruiting.β βHiring from your network makes hiring decisions less risky, and can give you strong conviction to compensate these individuals sufficiently to pull them in.β
βYou shouldΒ aim for 50β60% of early hires to have experience working forΒ VC-backed tech companies.β
βFew startups hire an in-house recruiter ahead of raising a Series A, and only 10% of the companies we analyzed had hired a recruiter by the time their headcount hit 10.β
In the early days, βyou have to be personally proactive in identifying, and engaging with, potential candidates. This founder-led recruiting strategy involves a mix between:
Secondary networkββfriends of friendsβ including angels, investors and other people you know and trust,
Cold outboundβsearching for specific profiles from specific companies on LinkedIn (you are advised to become proficient at using LinkedIn Boolean search), and then reaching out directly,
Inboundβcultivating an inbound flow of interested candidates through social media, blog posts, media presence, etc.β
βAnalyzing the hiring patterns of successful startups offers templates for how to approach teambuilding, which vary by business model. On average, 4.5 of the first 10 hires are in technical roles, with 3 inΒ GTM, and the remaining 2.5 split acrossΒ G&AΒ and Operations.β
βItβs critical toΒ maintain a really high hiring bar early on. This will set the tone for all future hiring, which will ultimately determine your companyβs success.β
βOn average,Β one of the first 10 hires made by successful startups was at an executive levelΒ (C-suite or VP job title).β
βMost startups fail at hiring because they overvalue experience, and undervalue aptitude.β
βWe recommend focusing on a Head of Talent or an experienced internal recruiter (five to seven years of prior experience) as your first hire into this area. The rule of thumb for triggering this hire is that you should have a plan (and funding) to hire more than 20 people over the following 12 months, with a sustained pace of scaling expected beyond that.β
βYour internal recruiter should report directly to the CEO, or alternatively to theΒ COO.β
Wednesday, Oct. 2nd: Rich Barton is a successful tech founder known for creating billion-dollar companies like Expedia, Zillow, and Glassdoor. His strategy, called Data Content Loops, helps these companies dominate their markets by providing valuable information directly to consumers. This approach allows them to generate free user acquisition and build trusted brands in industries like real estate, travel, and job search. - Kevin Kwok
βBarton is a strong contender for the title of best consumer tech founder because of his repeated success. Heβs founded three consumer companies each worth over a billion dollars with Expedia ($18.6B), Zillow ($8.8B), and Glassdoor (Said to have been acquired for $1.6B).β
βThe Rich Barton Playbook is building Data Content Loops to disintermediate incumbents and dominate Search. And then using this traction to own demand in their industries.β
βIn order to grow their demand high enough to become a beneficial flywheel, Bartonβs companies use a Data Content Loop to bootstrap their demand and create unique content and index an industry online (homes for Zillow, hotels and flights for Expedia, companies for Glassdoor):
Expedia: Prices for flights and hotels that before youβd have to get from travel agent
Zillow: Zestimate of what your house is likely worth that before youβd have to get from broker
Glassdoor: Reviews from employees about what a company is like that before youβd have to get from a recruiter or the company itself.β
βHis companies take power from the incumbents and give it to consumers. Instead of trying to hoard information, they are on the side of consumers and giving them more data transparency.β
βGlassdoor revealed how employees really felt about companies. Zillow shed light on what any house was worth. Expedia let people see the prices and availability of flights and hotels without talking to an agent. These were knowable things that people have always talked about with each other. There are few topics adults love gossiping about more than work, real estate, or travel.β
βThey create common knowledge in their industries from information only middlemen had access to before, from public-but-hard to aggregate data, or from information collected from users themselves. These intermediaries, whether brokers or travel agents were misaligned. They controlled what information was shared with the public, but has an interest in withholding it. Instead of pushing increasingly more and higher quality information to the public, they maintained the status quo.β
βBefore Zillow and Glassdoor, if you wanted to look up information about a specific home or company, there wasnβt a webpage for it. Bartonβs companies created the definitive page for each house and company. Using a combination of data from authoritative sources (like all the various MLS systems) and user-generated data, they created high quality content unique to each company or listing. Being among the first to do this let them do a huge SEO land grab, which has been hard to displace since.β
Thursday, Oct. 3rd: French based consumer lending startup Younited will become a public company by merging with Iris Financial which is already listed on Euronext. Younited launched in 2012. Iris will invest β¬150-200m in Younited for a 40% stake implying a β¬375-500m valuation for Younited. After the acquisition, Younited will start lending from its balance sheet instead of raising capital from third parties. - BFM, Les Echos
Friday, Oct. 4th: David Peterson at Angular wrote about the issues associated with startups that are trying to βsell the workβ instead of selling software. - Angular
Selling work has 3 core benefits: (i) opening up new vertical opportunities which were not addressable before because too challenging or unprofitable, (ii) aligning incentives with customers on an outcome based pricing and (iii) easier to sell a piece of a completed work than a productivity improvement.
βAs is true for many service providers, any pricing power they have is based on their brand alone, and that isnβt enough to protect them from the deflationary impact of AI. Most of the benefits their customers imagined they were getting from AI (whether real or not!) got transferred right to their customers.β
βThe continued competitiveness of open source models suggests to me that most of βthe workβ itself will eventually become a near-commodity. If thatβs the case, then the clearing price for that work will continue to fall. In that world, only business models that donβt rely on making money by selling that work will succeed.β
Saturday, Oct. 5th: Harry interviewed Floβs cofounder and CEO Dmitry Gurski. Flo is the leading womenβs health mobile app specialised in period tracking with 70m MAUs, 5m paid subscribers and $200m in ARR. - 20VC
Dmitry Gurski grew up in the 90s in Belarus, a country left in ruins after the fall of the Soviet Union. His family had to grow their own vegetables in the garden because stores were empty. Dmitry started his career in book publishing, writing computer books and starting his own publishing house, ultimately becoming responsible for 2k educational books. When the App Store was launched, Dmitry decided to work on mobile apps, beginning with those whose content was based on books. After six years of building mobile apps, he started working on period tracking. It took multiple iterations before landing on a product with strong metrics.
βPeople accepted the idea to pay for subscriptions, and it was a huge cultural change.β βWhen we started monetisation, our dream was to monetise 5% of the American audience. Today, 25% of US women excluding teenagers are paying for Flo.β
βItβs good to have great competitors because you have an opportunity to learn from them. Great competitors speed up your execution pace and prevent you from becoming complacent.β
βWhen we launched Flo, I immediately understood that we had a chance to become a big business because our addressable market was obviously deep and retention was outstanding. I saw a long-term retention that I had never seen before.β
βGreat retention is really rare in health and fitness. Retention does not depend on the product but on the use case. You can create the perfect fitness app it will always have a terrible retention because people will have the same churn rate as for physical gyms.β
βIt's much more difficult nowadays than it used to be 10 years ago to get an initial audience organically even if your product is outstanding.β
For consumer mobile apps, simplicity is a key success factor. βFor consumers, simplicity is more significant than anything else.β
Persistence is the key to success. βI donβt believe in talent. I believe that, all people are approximately the same. What makes people different is just hours of hard work, hard focused work.β βMost people, they just canβt work really hard for a very long time. And itβs what distinguishes successful people and less successful people.β
Successful founders must have a certain level of βcrazinessβ to build a venture backed company. βSmart people work in McKinsey. Founders, theyβre crazy. Itβs not rational. Why would you do something with a 1% chance of success?β
Flo has a frugal company culture. βI never use business class. I would better pay one month of salary to a developer in Lithuania than waste this money for my comfort.β
Consumer subscription model is misunderstood by many investors. βMost investors just donβt understand this business model. They confuse it with SaaS and make very wrong conclusions because of that.β
Sunday, Oct. 6th: Revolutβs co-founder and CEO, Nik Storonsky, shared a guide on building high-performing teams. - Quantum Light
βA high-performance organization isΒ A-player centricΒ (top 15%-25%), focusingΒ resources to retain and promoteΒ top talent whileΒ exiting under-performersΒ as fast as possible.β
βPerformance is aΒ direct CEO mandate. Talent is a force multiplier for the whole company. It shouldnβt sit under HR, but it should be a core priority of the office of the CEO. We recommend setting up a small performance team reporting to the CEO, staffed with capable operators.β
βPerformance isΒ best articulated over three dimensions:
Deliverables,Β that measure ability to complete tasks assigned considering speed, quality and complexity
Skills, that are the technical competencies required for the role
Culture,Β that represents alignment with the company's overall values.β
Monday, Oct. 7th: HubSpotβs co-founder, Brian Halligan, shared valuable lessons on scaling the company. - Sequoia
βPerspiration vs Inspiration: In startup mode, the CEO role is 90% perspiration and 10% inspiration. In scaleup mode, the CEO role is 10% perspiration and 90% inspiration.β
βManage your trust battery carefully: As a CEO, you generally start out with a fully charged trust battery. Over time you make callsβyou get some right and get some wrong. If you get too many wrong in a row, you lose a lot of the charge in the trust battery with the organization and along with it some of your moral authority. My rule of thumb is that you get a few βCEO cardsβ to play that may be very bold bets or ones that your team disagrees with. You donβt have 52.β
βKeep your head in the sky and your feet on the ground: You need to paint a compelling vision of a terrific future for your company while at the very same time dealing head on with the very real problems you have today.β
βYour culture is your second product:Β At HubSpot, we have two products: one we sell to our customers (HubSpotβs CRM), and one we sell to our employees (HubSpotβs culture). Like your product, you need your culture to be unique relative to the competition (for talent) and you want your culture to be very valuable (for talent). Like your product, when your culture is unique and valuable, your company turns into a magnet that attracts and retains terrific talent. And also like your product, itβs never doneβit needs continuous iteration.β
βMy advice is not to sweat it too much if you need to replace leaders on your team as you grow. The company and the leader are likely both better off.β
βRecruit from companies just a few years ahead of you:Β Iβve found this applies to board members and executives. When we hire folks from companies that are several orders of magnitude larger than HubSpot (i.e. Microsoft, Google), there is an impedance mismatch. They are dealing with different issues at a different scale. Weβve had good luck with hiring folks who are at companies we admire that are just a few steps ahead of us.β
βHome grown talent is underrated:Β Iβve noticed that the VC playbook when a new round is done is to recommend βuplevelingβ some of the home grown talent.Β In some cases this might be right, but I think folks over index on it.Β If you look at the executive teams of some of the best companies (i.e. Apple, Nvidia, Amazon, etc) they are full of people who have been there aΒ longΒ time.Β HubSpotβs current management team has a lot of βhome grownβ talent.β
βWhen everyone is zigging, you should zag:Β Regardless of what you think of Peter Thielβs politics, he wrote a really good book on startups calledΒ Zero To One. In it, he talks about how you need to be right about something that everyone thinks you are wrong about for a long time. This type of βzaggingβ worked for HubSpot three times.
First, we decided to focus on SMB (more M than S, btw) and stuck with it when everyone and their brother thought we should move to the enterprise.
Second, we decided we would move from a marketing application company to a CRM platform company, competing with Salesforce, when everyone and their sister told us we were crazy to try because they were too hard to compete with.
Third, we decided we would βbuildβ (craft!) our CRM in-house as opposed to acquiring our way there when everyone and their cousin told us that we needed to follow ye olde CRM M&A franken-playbook.β
Tuesday, Oct. 8th: Hindenburg published a short-selling report on Roblox. - Hindenburg
Roblox is a $27 billion online gaming platform headquartered in San Mateo, CA. The company was incorporated in 2004 and is led by founder and CEO David Baszucki.
βInsiders have cashed out $1.7 billion in stock since the companyβs 2021 direct listing. In the last 12 months, insiders have sold ~$150 million in stock, including ~$115 million by CEO Baszucki personally.β
βOur research indicates that Roblox is lying to investors, regulators, and advertisers about the number of βpeopleβ on its platform, inflating the key metric by 25-42%+. We also show how engagement hours, another key metric, is inflated by an estimated 100%+.β
βOur findings show that the companyβs reported number of βpeopleβ regularly matches Robloxβs reported Daily Active Users (DAUs). But DAUs, according to Robloxβs own disclosures, βare not a measure of unique individuals accessing Robloxβ because they can include numerous accounts run by a single person, such as alternate or bot accounts. Given these definitions, we believe Roblox intentionally conflates βpeopleβ with DAUs, consistently inflating the reported number of people on its platform.β
βWe have more accounts registered to the U.S., multiple times over the population of the U.S.β ββEvery time we see a user sign up, thereβs a 60% chance that this sign up is from an alt [account]β
βRoblox forums detail how users regularly have dozens of alternate accounts to βfarmβ for goods on Roblox, avert bans and increase their follower counts, among other reasons.β
βIn addition to alternate accounts, bots are rampant on the platform. For example, Robloxβs 7Β most popular game, Adopt Me!, has garnered over 83,000 Change.org signatures to remove it from the platform due to extensive βbottingβ that βbreaksβ Roblox.β
βBeyond inflated key user metrics, our in-game research revealed an X-rated pedophile hellscape, exposing children to grooming, pornography, violent content and extremely abusive speech.β
βRoblox faces saturation in its top markets like the U.S. and Europe. It is now attempting to keep the appearance of growth alive by adding loss-generating users in markets like Asia, per a former employee. Profitability has plummeted despite reporting higher user metrics. The conversion rate of new daily active users to paying users has been in steady decline since 2020. Roblox is now hoping to drive incremental growth by pitching advertisers that ~79.5 million βpeopleβ spend an average of 2.4 hours per day on the platform.β
Wednesday, Oct. 9th: I watched Jason Lemkin interviewing Slice's CRO Lauren Padelford on scaling a vertical SaaS. - SaaStr
Slice serves independent pizzerias and generates over $100m in ARR. There are 30-40k independent pizzerias in the US, while large pizza chains like Dominoβs and Pizza Hut collectively own around 20k pizzerias. Pizzerias generate $50bn in revenue. Slice provides software and services (e.g. marketing on their behalf, selling boxes) to help independent pizzerias run their businesses more effectively.
βWe really vertically integrate the shop. We're looking at all the jobs to be done that a shop has. We help them do more of making great pizza and do less of running the shop.β
βTo win SMBs as a vertical SaaS, you need to be the entire ERP to achieve the ROI they need.β
Vertical SaaS needs depth. Instead of point solutions, aim to become the "ERP" of your vertical, addressing all the customer's needs. βThe true vertical would be the whole shop and that's what we're doing."
High ACV is crucial. Aiming for at least $10k annual revenue per customer is necessary to make the SMB model work. "You almost have to earn at least $10k a year from these very small businesses to make the math work."
βPizza owners donβt want to find point solutions for everything they need. They want a single partner.β
As a vertical SaaS, you should own the majority market share and not only target a 10-20% market share as most horizontal SaaS do.
βEvery shop that opens will just open in your platform just because you solved all the problems.β βYou can open a pizzeria and immediately install the unfair advantage that Domino's has for your own local shop.β
βIn sales, it's almost always a power law with 20% of the reps doing 80% of the number.β
To reach busy pizza owners, show value before pitching your solution. Help them succeed or connect with other owners to build community. Itβs a long-term strategy, planting seeds for potential conversions down the line.
Thursday, Oct. 10th: Nathan Benaich at Airstreet published its State of AI Report for 2024. - Airstreet
βFrontier lab performance converges, but OpenAl maintains its edge following the launch of o1, as planning and reasoning emerge as a major frontier.β
βFoundation models demonstrate their ability to break out of language as multimodal research drives into mathematics, biology, genomics, the physical sciences, and neuroscience.β
βNVIDIA remains the most powerful company in the world, enjoying a stint in the $3T club, while regulators probe the concentrations of power within GenAl. More established GenAl companies bring in billions of dollars in revenue, while start-ups begin to gain traction in sectors like video and audio generation.β
βAlthough companies begin to make the journey from model to product, long-term questions around pricing and sustainability remain unresolved. Driven by a bull run in public markets, Al companies reach $9T in value, while investment levels grow healthily in private companies.β
βIn April, Meta dropped the Llama 3 family, 3.1 in July, and 3.2 in September. Llama 3.1 405B, their largest to-date, is able to hold its own against GPT-40 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet across reasoning, math, multilingual, and long-context tasks. This marks the first time an open model has closed the gap with the proprietary frontier.β
βOn novel tasks, where LLMs are unable to rely on memory and retrieval, performance often degrades. This suggests that they still often struggle to generalize beyond familiar patterns without external help.β
Friday, Oct. 11th: Sam Lessin and Yoni Rechtman from Slow shared valuable lessons on seed investing. - Sam Lessin, Yoni Rechtman
βThe VC factory model is dead. People have watched and learned tough lessons on dilution mill β smart kids focus on capital efficiency and financial optionality vs. conveyor belt.β
βEvolution of software business model / death of 'selling software' and rise of software-leverage-to-gather-assets.....this is the clear 'shift in thinking' of the smarties.... Build the software to get the assets efficiently, the value isn't the software.β
βDiversification of downstream capital relationships as it becomes about asset acquisition, you need access to debt, etc. PE folks etc become way more relevant / building relationships there.β
Yoni loves pre-seed for 3 key reasons: (i) maximum flexibility to pursue the best plan because you can pivot as many times as you want, (ii) rare VC value added via collaborative due diligence and (iii) no time pressure.
Saturday, Oct. 12th: Dave Yuan wrote about franchise as an archetype for vertical SaaS companies. Franchises can serve as a model for vertical SaaS , offering business-in-a-box services to small businesses. Vertical SaaS can replicate franchise services like marketing, supply chain support, and demand generation. By bundling these, vertical SaaS can achieve higher revenue take rates and provide more value to their customers. - Tidemark
βMost Vertical SaaS companies get to 1% of GMV take rate, with the occasional high flyers getting to 3%. At Tidemark, we believe the industry has set its aims far too low. The ambitious founder can earn a much, much higher take rate.β
βA franchise is a company that sells βbusiness-in-a-boxβ opportunities to entrepreneurs. In the typical franchise business model, the franchisor takes a revenue royalty in return for helping with aspects of the business. A 2018 report from FRANdata pegged the average revenue take rate to be 6% for franchisors across 29 industries, from pizzas to tax prep.β
A franchisor usually offers a bundle of services including (i) marketing support, (ii) in network demand generation, (iii) supply chain, (iv) operations playbook, (v) financing and (vi) IP.
Sunday, Oct. 13th: General Catalyst raised $8bn in capital with $4.5bn for its VC funds (seed, growth and healthcare focused funds), $1.5bn to incubate new companies and $2bn to develop strategic businesses. - FT, Tech.eu
βBehind the moves that weβre making is the fundamental observation that venture capital does not scale. There are the same number of outlier [companies] whether you make funds bigger or make funds smaller.β - Hemant Taneja
βThe 25-year-old firm has launched a division to build companies, rather than simply fund them, and made a string of unusual investments. It announced plans to acquire a hospital system in Ohio this year, as part of Tanejaβs push to embed technology into healthcare.β
βGeneral Catalyst has also explored ways to hold companies for longer than the decade or so a traditional venture firm might. Those include considering strategies more familiar to private equity groups, such as launching a roughly $1bn continuation fund to hang on to start-up stakes and rolling up multiple small businesses in a sector to create one dominant player, according to people with knowledge of the plans.β
βGeneral Catalyst has a deep history of hatching 45+ successful companies, including Commure, Crescendo, Demandware, Hippocratic, Homeward, Kayak, and Livongo.β
βThis includes the Customer Value Strategy, which provides non-dilutive capital to accelerate growth, and the GC Transformation Flywheel, which connects innovators with adopters to drive industry transformation at scale.β
Monday, Oct. 14th: Stripe acquired of stablecoin infrastructure Bridge for $1.1bn. Bridge previously raised $58m from top investors including Sequoia, Ribbit and Index. - Forbes, Patrick Collison, Bridge, Sequoia
βThanks to stablecoins, businesses around the world will benefit from significant speed, coverage, and cost improvements in the coming years. Stripe is going to build the worldβs best stablecoin infrastructure, and, to that end, we are delighted to welcome Bridge to Stripe.β
βWeβd like to believe that Bridge has played a small role in this transition. Shortly after launch, several cross-border payments companies integrated our APIs, proving that stablecoins could be used to make global money movement faster and cheaper.β
βStablecoins represent an entirely new payments platform. Realizing the potential of this platform will be a decades-long journey. And as weβve gotten to know the Stripe team, itβs become clear that we both share a vision for whatβs possible with stablecoins and an excitement around the opportunity to create and build this future.β
βIn 2023, when they shared their vision for a new stablecoin-based platform that would make all payments seamless with a single API, we were as excited about working with them as we were about their transformative idea.β
βOver the years, we have been fortunate to partner early with many companies that were later acquired and went on to change the world, including Instagram, YouTube, PayPal and WhatsApp. We believe Bridge will join that list of iconic companies that achieved their full potential after acquisition.β
βBridge (FKA Shift Pay) is building APIs that enable businesses to allow users to pay with crypto easily and cheaply across different coins and chains.β
βBridge aims to be a crypto native American Express, integrating with businesses to enable users to make purchases across the globe (across any chain) and settle in their native currency. Users can instantly transact in any crypto asset and pay for the purchase with the assets they already own. Eg: instantly buy an NFT with ETH, settle the transaction with USD; pay L2 gas fees in MATIC, settle in ETH.β
Tuesday, Oct. 15th: Turner Novak interviewed Sliceβs cofounder and CEO, Ilir Sela. - The Peel
There are 80k pizza shops in the US who collectively manage c.$48bn in sales. 25% of pizzerias are owned by large chains (Pizza Hut, Dominoβs). Pizza accounts for almost 50% of delivery orders in the US. 5k net new pizzerias opened in 2022 including 4.8k independent and 200 owned by large chains.
Much of Sliceβs model is inspired by Dominoβs in terms of their focus on digital and on making franchisees very successful.
You can make great margins from a pizzeria. It costs less $3 to make and the average retail price of a pizza in the US is $17.
βI would say over 30 family and friends have pizza shopsβ The Albanian community is very involved in pizzerias in the US because stopped in Italy before moving to the US where they worked in pizzerias and learnt the craft.
βPizza owners are inheriting every business problem. They start off by wanting to make pizza and, and support their family but pretty quickly, they're inheriting financial jobs. They've gotta be the marketer, the technology person, HR, the whole thing. And it's incredibly lonely and it is incredibly difficult and challenging.β
βSlice was very important because I thought there could be a third way for people to operate in the industry. One way would be the franchise model. The second way would be purely independent. Third way would be working together as a team β having the support that is franchise-like, but remaining independent. So as we say in business, βfor yourself, but not by yourself.ββ
βSlice brings forward the economies of scale and the capabilities that benefit the Domino's franchisees without having to trade off the independence.β
Slice started with commerce enablement (website builder & online ordering) to replace phone ordering. Slice launched Slice Register as second product, a point-of-sale system that helps shop owners manage all sales channelsβonline, phone, and in-personβby centralising information to streamline operations. Most recently, Slice launched The Goods which is a procurement arm to aggregate Sliceβs pizzerias buying power to source and personalise packaging (e.g. pizza boxes, bags, plates, cups, napkins, etc.).
βThe cool thing about multi-product companies, is that each product can be an on-ramp for the customer.β
βSlice started as a bootstrapped company. It was under the brand mypizza.com. The idea was to create a fourth brand to compete with the big chains with MyPizza being the brand representing all the independents.β
To get early customers, Slice did not directly pitch them online ordering. β[Pizzerias] all had a fax number on the physical menu that they would distribute, mostly aimed at companies so that some admin at a company would fax an order to a pizza shop.β These fax machines were generating 1-2 orders per day. Slice found a way to convert an online order into a fax order through an API. It came back to restaurants asking them if they were keen to receive many more orders on these fax machines entrenched in their habits instead of pitching online ordering.
βThe franchise system is is pretty straightforward. You have a company that figured out a successful business model and put processes in place to a point where anyone can come in and replicate that same business model in some different geography, and then in exchange they get royalties.β
βSomeone can apply to become a franchisee of Domino's. Domino's gives them the right to open up a Domino's location in a specific geography that's exclusive to them. They follow all of Domino's systems and processes, and they take advantage of Domino's brand marketing and buying power and community. And in exchange, they have to pay Domino's. I don't know if this is the exact number, but let's call it 5% or 6% of gross sales now. Some other things that can be in play is Domino's forces their franchisees to buy all of their supplies from Domino's. So 60% of Domino's revenue is the supplies they sell to their franchisees.β
Slice bootstrapped the business to $40m in GMV, $4m in revenues and $3m in profits in 2015 with less than 10 people in the team. He had an opportunity to sell the business for $18m and ended up raising $1m with Firstround at $15-20m valuation to bring Slice to the next step of its journey.
Slice launched a consumer app in 2017 and became Slice as a brand in 2019. In 2023, Slice generated $1.3bn in online GMV.
βWe want to create an on-ramp, a platform so people can learn about what it's like to run a business, and then we want to be able to help them launch their new business.β βThe goal is for you to be able to not only apply for financing [to launch your pizzerias], but what I would like to do is create an education platform.β
In the past 12 months, Slice has helped 4-5 locations to launch with white-glove service to find a place, buy equipment, build the brand, integrate tech and run their shop.
An online customer is worth 4x more than an offline customer. Online ordering AOV on Slice is $41 vs. $22 by the phone because you donβt have to order from memory. You can also do a lot of things to upsell your online ordering funnel. Moreover, you also get customer data to re-engage them via online channels (emails, SMS) which increases orders frequency.
Vertical SaaS have to turn on marketplace features and vice versa. Slice launched its own marketplace but its does not take a cut - just a flat fee per order.
Wednesday, Oct. 16th: Monzoβs cofounder and previous CEO, Tom Bloomfield, shared his interpretation of founderβs mode. - Tom Bloomfield
Great leaders maintain a close connection with the product and dive deep into specific details.
Successful CEOs balance detailed oversight with strategic delegation, ensuring leaders are effective and invested in the companyβs core vision.
βThe process of building and maintaining trust between a CEO and an exec involves the CEO repeatedly going incredibly deep on niche subjects, verifying that the exec really knows whatβs going on in their department, and has a good grasp on the problems. As the exec builds trust, these deep-dives can become less frequent, but they never totally disappear. If the exec repeatedly doesnβt have a good grasp of the details as you dive deep into their domain, you quickly realize that you need to replace them.β
βI believe that great leaders have to be able to dig into the details, have an incredibly high bar for quality, and ultimately do great IC work themselves. Great managers have to manage the work - they should primarily be responsible for quality and speed of output. Managing people must be secondary to managing the product.β
Thursday, Oct. 17th: Gili Raananβs venture capital firm, Cyberstarts, has achieved significant success by launching several multi-billion-dollar cybersecurity startups (Wiz, Fireblocks, Island, Cyera). However, it has come under scrutiny due to its adviser compensation program. Executives from major corporations, who stood to benefit from these startups, were part of a network that shared in Cyberstartsβ profits, prompting ethical concerns. In response to the growing criticism, Raanan recently suspended the profit-sharing component, drawing attention to potential conflicts of interest within their business model. - Forbes
βFor some executives, there was more to it: compensation, potentially quite lucrative, in the form of profits from Cyberstartsβ blue chip early-stage funds. The execs who participated in Sunrise had the option to share in a pool of 4% of Cyberstartsβ own earmarked profits, known as carried interest, provided they took those calls and provided meaningful help, as determined by Cyberstarts.β
βCyberstarts had written early checks to standout security companies including Wiz, the cloud security startup that recently turned down a $23 billion acquisition offer by Google; $8 billion-valued crypto security startup Fireblocks; $3 billion-valued enterprise browser business Island; and $1.4 billion-valued data security startup Cyera. Over the lifetime of one of the firmβs funds, participants could expect to see payouts of as much as $250,000.β
βCyberstarts was suspending the compensation part of the program, effective immediately.β
βThe executives who participated typically oversaw massive software and security budgets. Their organizations had the power to award exactly the type of large-sized contracts that could boost a fledgling startupβs financials and position it for success.β
βAt worst, their own financial interests might cloud their judgment, or conflict with the best interests of their employer.β
βOf 54 advisers named on Cyberstartsβ own website in May, one-third have since been scrubbed.β
βIn June, heβd told Forbes that about half of Sunriseβs advisers had opted into payments. But in October, he said the number was really only 20%, or about 15 people.β
βLast week, the firm announced its fourth seed fund, a $60 million vehicle bringing its total assets under management to $720 million.β
β[Gil is] a native Israeli who had served in Unit 8200, the elite cyber division of the Israeli Defense Force that has produced many of the countryβs leading tech entrepreneurs, Raanan learned firsthand that technology alone didnβt lead to market traction.β
βAfter Sequoiaβs Israel arm wound down in 2016, Raanan struck out on his own, launching Cyberstarts two years later in Mikhmoret, on the countryβs central coast.β
βSince 2018, Raanan and Cyberstarts have achieved five exits, worth a combined $1.6 billion, without a single public flameout.β
βIn addition to Chipotle, with its eight identified contracts, Forbes identified five contracts each signed with Cyberstarts startups at real estate giant Jones Lang LaSalle and pharmaceutical multinational Takeda, both of which have employed current or former Sunrise advisers. Mortgage lender New American Funding, security unicorn Armis and BNY Mellon, the worldβs largest custodian bank, appeared to have signed contracts with four.β
βCyberstarts βmanaged to crack the codeβ on achieving early product market fit. (Sequoia has since backed five Cyberstarts unicorns: Cyera, Fireblocks, Island, Wiz and Zafran.) βAs a result, these businesses are often able to scale faster than usual,β Leone wrote.β
βAs participants in Cyberstartsβ adviser network, called Sunrise, they were used to taking introductions from the firm to meet with its three or four new startup investments each year. The startups could receive product feedback and gain insight into what potential large-sized buyers needed. For the executives, mostly chief information security officers, or CISOs, the startup founders gave them the inside track on new technologies emerging from Israelβs elite hacking units.β
Friday, Oct. 18th: Adyenβs 2024 Embedded Finance Report highlights a $185bn market opportunity for SaaS platforms embedding financial services, with potential revenue growth of 3-4x. As demand from SMBs rises, only 20% of the market is currently served, leaving substantial growth potential. Embedded finance, such as payments, lending, accounts, and card issuance, allows platforms to centralize business and banking solutions, enhancing customer retention and revenue streams. - Adyen
Saturday, Oct. 19th: Jamin Ball at Altimeter wrote about misaligned incentives between founders and investors in venture capital. - Jamin Ball
βIf we rewind the clock 15-20 years, fund sizes were significantly smaller. The 2% (annual management fees) part of the equation was nice, but if you wanted to βget richβ it was all about maximizing the 20%. In this path, the GPs and Founders win together - with large company exits. It was the singular focus of GPs and founders.β
βFund sizes have ballooned significantly. So much so, that the 2% part of the equation is very meaningful given the size of funds! In the past, to βget richβ as in investor it was all about maximizing the 20%. Today, with fund sizes where they are, many are instead looking to optimize for the 2%. This means raising as much as possible, and deploying as much as possible (as quickly as possible).β
βIn the past, the only path to βget richβ for GPs also resulted in a βget richβ path for founders. Today there is a βget richβ path for GPs where the outcome of the founders is irrelevant. Doesnβt matter how the underlying companies in a fund perform, you collect the annual management fees regardless.β
βAm I being offered more money at a higher valuation because the investor truly believes more than anyone else, or are they just playing a deployment game?β
βIf your job as an investor is to always go find the next investment to deploy the next dollar, it gets really hard to actually slow down and work with each portfolio company / board you're on.β
βAsk yourself this question when deciding on who to work with. βAm I working with a 2% or a 20% venture firm?β The 2% firms are optimizing for deployment. The 20% are optimizing for large company outcomes.β
Sunday, Oct. 20th: Abraham Thomas wrote about the economics of data businesses. - Pivotal
βSuccessful data businesses areΒ allΒ built around a unique or proprietary data asset.β βWhoever controls the data, captures the value. Intermediaries get squeezed. A common failure mode is to build a business on top of somebody elseβs data.β
βBusinesses send their counter-party data to Dun & Bradstreet, in order to access D&Bβs B2B credit database β which is based on aggregating all these counter-party reports.β
βIf your data product is substantially similar to existing products, then one way to be βbetterβ is to offer a dramatically lower price. But this doesnβt work for data! The concept of minimum viable corpus means you need to be above a certain size and quality, else your data is almost worthless. And the very particular economics of data acquisition (brute force, economies of scale, data collection loops) mean that it's hard to build an MVC thatβs dramatically cheaper than the incumbent offering. So βdisruption from belowβ rarely works.β
βTypically, a successful new data product isΒ notΒ a variation on the existing data; itβs a brand new data asset from a completely different source, exploiting a completely different set of loops.β
Data businesses rely on unique, proprietary data as their primary product, with various acquisition methods such as brute force collection, affiliate partnerships, and customer data loops.
Owning and controlling unique data is essential, as dependence on external data sources can limit value capture. Transforming and combining datasets creates proprietary value.
Data businesses require significant upfront investment but grow faster over time, benefiting from network effects, economies of scale, and increased data relevance, ultimately creating high barriers to entry.
Monday, Oct. 21st: Alex Clayton publicly shared the presentation on the tech market that he prepared for Meritechβs LPs annual meeting. - Meritech
Equity markets are at an all-time high (24% YTD increase) but itβs mostly driven by large tech companies (e.g. Amazon, Apple, Arm, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia).
Median multiples for publicly listed SaaS are below historical norms (6.1x EV/NTM revenues vs. 8.2x before the post covid boom).
Growth is still the most dominant factor in valuation for public SaaS companies. Wall Street values growth over FCF by 3:1.
βSaaS market leaders are larger and more valuable than ever before with little to no AI revenue (yet) while the overall index has struggled. AI could make them bigger.β
Tuesday, Oct. 22nd: KeyBanc and Sapphire published the 2024βs edition of their SaaS annual survey. - KeyBanc
βARR growth is expected to slightly decelerate to ~19% in 2024 after companies already experienced growth deceleration in 2023 from ~22% to ~21%.
βBoth gross retention and net retention have remained and are expected to remain relatively consistent at ~90% and ~101%, respectively.β
βSales quotas have also increased from ~$675K in 2022 to ~$750K in 2023 and 2024, indicating that expectations have become greater for sales teams.β
Wednesday, Oct. 23th: Keith Rabois made a presentation on how to hire in startups. - Keith Rabois
βThe most important and useful advice I ever got from a board member in 23 years of working in tech was, when I was at Square, Vinod Khosla said to me, the team you build is the company you build.β
βAt PayPal we had this philosophy, where we didn't allow for general managers. We didn't hire a single person in the company whose skill was managing people. If you were going to lead a design team, you had to be the best designer. You're going to lead the engineering team, you had to be the best engineer.β
βThe most important concept is you cannot hire the obvious people.β
βPeter Thiel told me that you can't hire anybody over 30. By time you're 30, everybody on the planet knows how to assess you pretty accurately because there's enough data points on your resume back then and as a startup you will not be able to outspend large tech companies that are very profitable or have infinite money.β
βThe first day anybody starts, have them write down on a piece of paper the 5 or 10 most impressive people they know, and definitely do it on the first day and then go reach out to those 5 or 10 people.β
βWe call gene pool engineering: find the places where the people have the skills you want the most currently work. And then go to LinkedIn and go surf all of the profiles of the people that work at those three companies, let's say, and send them an email from you as CEO.β
βI think the best reason to announce a financing is actually for recruiting. I don't believe that financing announcements typically generate customers. There are rare exceptions, but you shouldn't announce the financing because you think you're going to get customers. It does help bring talent to you. More importantly, it may help you close.β
βHow do you assess people that don't have the classic experience? The most important lesson was it wasn't that I couldn't evaluate people because I picked all three really well. It was that I couldn't evaluate strangers.β
βI can definitely tell you the people who created the most value in the history of PayPal, are the weirdest people that worked at PayPal. Max Levchin earlier this yearjoked with me on stage that I was the most normal person that worked at PayPal. So think about that. I'm the most normal person of 300 people. So, he meant it as an insult. I took it as a compliment.β
βThe other way to cheat is hire interns. I don't think you can do it too early. So I think you do need a critical density of people that have some experience in a job somewhere, but interns have more upside than anybody you're going to hire. Because what happens to the best interns is they become founders. Some fraction of those founders become really famous, and then you're never going to hire them. But if you intercept them when they're 16 to 20 years old, they don't know that they're yet ready to found a company and be the next Mark Zuckerberg. So you want to hire them as early as possible.β
βThere's two reasons you hire. One is value creation. Then, there's value protection. So experience is not your friend, typically, when you're trying to create value. If I'm trying to create value, if this is the way I'm going to compete with the rest of the planet. I probably don't want anybody who has experience. Out of 254 people at PayPal, there were exactly two people who knew anything about financial services.β
βShould you hire someone who walks in the door and says, I want to found a company in two years? My answer is yes. The way I look at it is, first of all, these people have more potential. And then secondly, my job is to make sure the company is so interesting, so valuable and such a challenge for any of the employees that they don't want to leave.β
βI'm trying to do is figure out what someone's strengths and weaknesses are. What I like to do is basically try to match what this person is motivated by and what they're talented at to the problem I have. Is this person Iβm about to pull the trigger on or could pull the trigger on, do you have an unfair advantage in solving this specific problem? So what I'm trying to figure out is does the person have a super power or strength that might make it more probable than not that they can solve the problem I'm suffering through.β
βIt's kind of arrogant of me to assume that you wake up and have some interest in Stripe. It's my job to convey why Stripe is the most compelling thing that you could do with your life.β
βAlmost no one maps the importance of recruiting as 1st priority for founders to their time allocation. It doesn't have to be perfect mapping, but you want it to be as close as possible.β
Thursday, Oct. 24th: The Economist wrote a great paper on GLP-1βs potential ability to transform healthcare. - The Economist
GLP-1 drugs revolutionize multiple health areas. Originally developed for diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists are now approved or in trials for treating cardiovascular disease, obesity, sleep apnea, and even conditions like Alzheimer's, addiction, and inflammation-based diseases due to their broad cellular and brain impacts.
Beyond healthcare, GLP-1 drugs influence industries from food to aviation due to their potential to reduce obesity and calorie consumption; these effects may lower healthcare costs but also require public health systems to adjust to preventive uses and manage high drug costs long term.
βThese drugs [GLP-1] seem to activate basic protective mechanisms in cells, such as reducing inflammation and clearing out junk, thereby keeping organs healthier. They also have powerful effects on the brain, through which they can both further influence the health of the rest of the body, and even affect behaviour.β
βAt first glance, the wider effects seen fromΒ GLP-1 drugs might look like ancillary benefits from their effect on weight. That does happen, of course, but research shows that it is not the full story. A study of more than 17,600 overweight and obese patients from 41 countries who took semaglutide found that participants lost about 10% of their body weight and had a 20% reduction in serious adverse coronary events, strokes, heart attacks and all-cause mortality.β
βCost looms large in any discussion about these drugs, as well as the need to take them for a lifetime. Both concerns are likely to prove temporary. In years to come the growing level of competition and the arrival of generic copies will lower prices and broaden access.β
βIf the average United Airlines passenger were to lose 10lbs (4.5kg), it would save the airline $80m a year in fuel costs.β
Friday, Oct. 25th: Sierra raised a $175m funding round led by Greenoaks at a $4.5bn valuation. Iconiq and Thrive also participated. The company reached $20m in ARR less than a year after its public launch, implying a 225x EV/ARR multiple. Sierra leverages AI agents to automate customer service for enterprise customers, including WeightWatchers, Casper, Sonos and Sirius. It to outperform alternatives in reducing hallucinations and enables customers to personalise their responses based on their corporate brands. Sierra was cofounded by Bret Taylor former co-CEO at Salesforce and chairman of the board at OpenAI. - Reuters, Techcrunch
Saturday, Oct. 26th: Chemistry is a new US-based early stage fund that recently raised $350m for its first fund to invest in series A rounds in B2B companies focused on fintech, infrastructure, developer tools and future of work software. The firm was cofounded by experienced and successful partners from top VC firms, including Index, a16z and Bessemer. Ray Kurzweil (ex. Bessemer) invested in companies such as Launch Darkly, Intercom, PagerDuty and Twitch. Mark Goldberg (ex. Index) invested in companies including Persona, Pilot, Plaid and Bridge. Kristina Shen (ex. a16z) invested into ServiceTitan, Piva, Tennr, Wrapbook and Decagon. - Techcrunch, Chemistry, Forbes
ββItβs incredibly rare for people to come together who are in the right stage of their career to do this,β Shen said. βIt felt obvious.ββ
βChemistry will look to make concentrated, hands-on bets with the fund, with each partner backing about two or three companies in each of the next three years.β
βChemistryβs pitch: offer founders the experience and track records theyβd expect from a bluechip VC firm, with the extra attention that can be difficult to consistently receive from a larger fund.β
ββWe were particularly impressed with the very thoughtful approach from having three different people with different DNAs, coming from different fund styles, that could work together,β she said. βThat felt very powerful.ββ
βMany emerging managers or first-time funds start small, collaborating with bigger players before moving up to competitive lead checks. But Chemistry is sized to go head-to-head from the start.β
βThe idea for Chemistry started with a question β what would a venture firm look like if its success was fully aligned with its foundersβ success?Β For months, we workshopped the answer. It would bring together experienced GPs from top venture firms with complementary networks and investment styles. It would out-hustle the legacy firms that have grown distracted by scale. It would be led by a lean team that brings founder energy and clean slates to the office every day.β
βAll three of us will actively support each investment.Β WeΒ are the portfolio services team, working in the trenches with our founders.β
Sunday, Oct. 27th: SilverLake and GIC are taking-private subscription management software Zuora for $1.7bn in an all-cash transaction expected to close in Q1-2025. Zuora generates $416m in ARR (implying a 4.25x EV/ARR multiple) growing 9% YoY with 11% FCF margins and 104% NDR. - Techcrunch, SaaStr
βThe idea behind Zuora was a platform for orchestrating a businessesβ various billing systems, with an emphasis on subscription management. Over the past decade, Zuora has slowly expanded its offerings through mergers and acquisitions, purchasing subscription invoicing and billing startup Frontleaf, subscription experience platform Zephr, and revenue recognition software provider Leeyo.β
βItβs not ahuge multiple, and in that sense, itβs a reminder that growth matters more than profitability today. But itβs also great to see PE continue to believe that can re-ignite growth in SaaS and make 3x+ their money here.β
Monday, Oct. 28th: I read an old Earlybird blog post about their $1 million seed investment in UiPathβs 2015 seed round. - Earlybird
βWe had our first meeting with Daniel Dines in July 2014 and were blown away with the technology vision, and Danielβs passion for and immersion in his product.β
"We at Earlybird Digital East led the 2015 round with a $1m investment.β
βIn the following two years, while UiPath focused on their product roadmap, we looked to help them secure a lead investor for their upcoming Series A round, which finally came together in April 2017.β
βAlong the way, the company grew its ARR from $1m to $100m in 21 months, a pace never seen before in enterprise software.β
βFor the first time, a company hailing from Romania was vying for global leadership in a major category, and executing a global growth strategy, with revenues spread out quite evenly around the world. A group of Eastern European engineers was beating its US- and UK-rooted, better-funded, competitors.β
βTo provide some context, the stereotype of the Eastern European techie was that of a hacker. Teams lacked the polish and presentation skills that youβd expect to find in a team in Silicon Valley, London or Berlin.β
Tuesday, Oct. 29th: Max Levchin wrote on Affirmβs approach to building a meritocratic culture. Key principles include fostering high performance, encouraging disagreement, leading by example and running towards problems. - Max Levchin
βHigh performance culture is pretty easy to define: a culture of individuals doing productive work for the company in the most efficient way possible and helping others do the same, while generally having a good time.β
βAffirm is a meritocracy: your talent, skill, and willingness to put it all to work define you here. We solve multivariate optimization problems β a certain minimum intellectual capacity is required. Demand excellence from yourself and from your teammates, donβt settle. Work-life balance tends to take care of itself if you love your work.β
βRun towards a problem; donβt assume someone else will take care of it.β
βAn occasional heroic act that helps Affirm win is a good thing, not a sign of poor planning. Constant heroic acts required for Affirm to survive is a sign of poor planning.β
βTime is the scarcest resource we have, be mindful of how you use yours, and your teamβs.β
βPost-mortem everything: the successes, the failures, and the near-misses β and learn.β
βIf you disagree, you must speak up, even escalate β especially before a decision is made.β
Wednsday, Oct. 30th: Euclid wrote about the future of vertical software. There is a shift from traditional SaaS to hybrid business models that capture broader value streams beyond tech spending (e.g. integrating transactional and industry specific revenue streams). - Euclid
βIt has now become clear, however, that a seat-based subscription OpEx is not the universal path to technology adoption across industries. The next chapter of successful vertical software is seeing the incorporation of substantial business model innovations, taking into account the idiosyncrasies of each vertical to minimize friction of adoption.β
βIn many traditional industries, tech spending has often plateaued between 2-5% of overall industry revenues. However, business model expansion has enabled new vertical startups to capture value from the 95% of non-tech spending, including sales & marketing, materials, freight, payment processing, labor, recruiting, training, insurance, banking, and many others.β
βAmidst this evolution of vertical software, we see two distinct species emerging:
Vertical Integration: the startup is the sole customer of the software, scaling revenue through tech-enabled services and/or roll-up strategies.
Synthetic Roll-Ups: a concept we introduced in our piece on AI Roll-Ups.β
"The Synthetic Roll-Up playbook is simple but powerful:
Identify an impactful constraint to revenue growth for your vertical and solve it.
Drive growth with an easy-to-adopt wedge and aggregate businesses.
Become the all-in-one solution for vertical, leveraging scale and first-party data to layer in more products and services over time, increase revenue per customer, and build a compounding moat.β
Thursday, Oct. 31st: Procore published its Q3-2024βs results. - Procore
It grew revenues by 19% YoY in the quarter reaching $1.2bn in ARR with 9% operating margin and 94% gross revenue retention rate. International revenues in the quarter grew 26% YoY.
It added 225 customers in the quarter reaching 16,975 customers including 2,261 with $100k+ ACVs.
βWe are on track to expand operating margins by 900 basis points for the full year.β
βIn Q3, we began communicating as well as implementing the go-to-market changes we previously announced. The two primary focus areas of our go-to-market evolution are: moving to a general manager model thatβs going to localize our go-to-market motion and better serve the regions in which we operate and introducing new technical roles to support all buyer personas and realizing the full value of the Procore platform.β
βOur international teams have long been advocating for a local go-to-market approach to drive a more connected customer experience.β
βWe are investing in our sales teams, part of which involves bringing on a couple of hundred net new go-to-market resources with the intent of hiring quickly to get them ramped and productive. Weβre only about 1 quarter in, but we are pacing well. All general managers and their leadership teams are expected to be in place by the end of the year.β
βWhen we support our customers with a tailored approach and ample technical resources, it generates improvement in retention and expansion ratesβ
βWith over 2 million construction professionals around the world collaborating on our platform, we have an unmatched corpus of construction data. This data allows us to provide customers with actionable insights that are not limited to one product or workflow but rather span projects and portfolios, giving our customers a comprehensive view of their projects and their businesses. We believe that because Procore is the only truly connected platform in the industry, we are the only solution that can fully harness the power of AI for our customers. You simply cannot maximize the benefit of these technologies if data is stuck in silos.β
Thanks to Julia for the feedback! π¦ Thanks for reading! See you next week for another issue! π
je confirme ! :-)
Amazing newsletter as always, thanks for the gems!
A few topics particularly stood out to me:
1.Sierra: The level of execution is incredible. Reaching $20M ARR in less than a year is a masterclass. Bret Taylor proves once again that he knows how to play at the highest level and build visionary companies. And that 225x EV/ARR multiple? Absolutely impressive.
2.Chemistry: No surprise they raised $350M for their first fund. The track record of their past investments is a true Hall of Fame, and itβs exciting to see what their next moves will be.
3.UiPath: That ARR growth from $1M to $100M in 21 months never fails to blow my mind every time I hear it.
4.Roblox: The Hindenburg report also sent chills down my spine. Listening to the Gamecraft podcast, I had a much more optimistic view of this ecosystemβand the company itself.
5.Bridge: A fantastic exit for Stripe (once again, Index involved). Raising $58M and exiting at $1.1B shows that the exit-to-funding ratio can be stellar when the team executes well.
6.Recruitment: I loved the point on Indexβs guide and Keith Raboisβ presentation.